Intracavernous alprostadil alfadex is more efficacious, better tolerated, and preferred over intraurethral alprostadil plus optional actis: a comparative, randomized, crossover, multicenter study.
Urology. 2000 Jan;55(1):109-13.
Shabsigh R, Padma-Nathan H, Gittleman M, McMurray J, Kaufman J, Goldstein I.
Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York 10032, USA.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety, and patient preference of intracavernously administered alprostadil alfadex and intraurethrally administered alprostadil. METHODS: A crossover, randomized, open-label multicenter study of 111 patients with erectile dysfunction of at least 6 months’ duration compared the efficacy, safety, and patient preference of intracavernosal alprostadil (EDEX/Viridal) with MUSE plus optional ACTIS. All patients underwent an in-office dose titration with either drug before undertaking an at-home treatment phase. The most frequently used doses during the at-home phase were 40 microg (44.1% of men) and 1000 microg (86.8% of men) for EDEX and MUSE, respectively; the mean doses were 26.1 microg and 922.5 microg for EDEX and MUSE, respectively. RESULTS: More EDEX than MUSE administrations resulted in an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse (82.5% versus 53.0%); significantly more patients using EDEX achieved at least one erection sufficient for sexual intercourse (92.6% versus 61.8%; P <0.0001); and EDEX use resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients attaining at least 75% of erections sufficient for sexual intercourse (75% versus 36.8%; P <0.0001). Penile pain was the most common side effect for both medications: 20.0% versus 30.5% (in-office) and 33.8% versus 25.0% (at-home) for EDEX and MUSE, respectively. Similar numbers of adverse events were reported with either treatment during the at-home phase. Patient and partner satisfaction was greater with EDEX, and more patients preferred this therapy, choosing to continue it during a patient preference period at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Since intracavernous injection therapy was more efficacious, better tolerated, and preferred by the patients and their partners, it should be offered as the first-choice treatment if oral therapy fails or is contraindicated.
Related Articles:- Optimizing the therapeutic approach of transurethral alprostadil.
- Intracavernous alprostadil alfadex (EDEX/VIRIDAL) is effective and safe in patients with erectile dysfunction after failing sildenafil (Viagra).
- Transurethral alprostadil as therapy for patients who withdrew from or failed prior intracavernous injection therapy.
- Evaluation of transurethral application of alprostadil for erectile dysfunction in Indonesians.
- Disappointing initial results with transurethral alprostadil for erectile dysfunction in a urology practice setting.























0 comments
Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment